No Justice Why??

Note: if you have a pop up blocker enabled, some of the content featured on this link may not appear as it should, it is recomended you disable your pop up blocker or put this site on the a list that allows pop ups to appear.

To fully comprehend this web link it is an excellent idea to familiarize yourself with the word and phrase definitions on this sub-link.

For your convenience the unfamiliar words and phrases referenced throughout this web link are defined herein and will also appear in blue when used within the write ups themselves.

If you have forgotten the meaning of the words or phrases you need only to click on the word, or phrase referenced in the write up in blue, and the meaning will appear in a box for you to review.

The definitions of the words and phrases below and throughout this link and its sub-links are mostly derived from Black’s Law Dictionary. Black’s is the highest authority that exists for the meanings of words and phrases relating to the exact lawful definitions used in law and courts across the United States.

Please keep in mind as you read the lawful exact meanings of words and phrases; many of the definitions will be totally different than you were taught, or have understood them to be. You will find out why as you review this link and its sub-links.

The Black’s definitions of words and phrases and other dictionaries used as references, pertain only to the subject that is being discussed within this web link.

Definitions of words not used in law making and by courts are condensed from Webster’s and Random House and Oxford ACD; and are so stated at the end of each definition; as are all references.

Important Note: when the names of people are defined or the names of courts; pay very close attention to the way each is spelled . As how they are spelled using all capital letters – partial capital letters and no capital letters changes the meaning of people and courts by law . The law which changed the meanings of the words is referenced at the end of each definition.

Keep in mind as you read these legal definitions on this sub link and throughout all the sub-links of this link; keep in mind the people that devised this conspiratorial destruction of a republic and constitution were and currently are; zealots. These zealots devised and revised sinister plans of deceit upon the trusting citizens of the United States to take total control of the United States from within and overthrow the government that was formed in 1791.

Word and Phrase Definitions

Cloak : “Used by the unscrupulous of watchwords of western democracy as onslaughts of a populace using liberty ASA – for an attach upon order and stability” (ref: Webster’s unabridged 1993). Using other words for the same definition; and for this web site; cloak means: Zealots acting as a democracy put forth enormous amounts of propaganda (falsehoods) via intentional misleading of words and phrases to the population of Republic citizens as an attach upon order and stability of the Republic of the United States.

deceit : practice of misrepresenting the truth, dishonest act or statement (ref: Random House, Webster’s and Oxford ACD).

De Facto Court/Government : An accepted way a court or Government is operated; however its operation is unlawful or illegitimate (ref: Black’s 6-7).

De Facto Judge : A Judge which conducts a Court under the pretence of law! However not under the law. A Judge in which he or she’s authority is defective. Not real law (ref: Black’s 6-7).

District of Columbia : A Federal District of the United States; an extension of Washington, D.C. ref: Oxford ACD. As a fact ; the District of Columbia is 68 square miles and houses the seat of Government; which by the Constitution is not to exceed 10 square miles. It is in fact a territory of the United States NOT a state of the Union.

The District of Columbia was unlawfully declared a state by (A)ct of Congress; the legislature; in 1934 title 4 sec. 112 (a)(b) for the illegal and unconstitutional purpose of crime prevention. To form agencies and pass laws for the District of Columbia and illegally enforce such laws under the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA against the sovereign citizens within the now 51 states of the United States. In doing this the legislature went directly against the US Constitution essentially abolishing it . Since 1934 these high officials and others have cloaked this one of many evil deeds which has lead to the false Federal imprisonment and inhumane deaths of tens of thousands of sovereign citizens of the United States. And, is in full force today. The US Constitution forbids the forming of a state from two or more states or any parts of existing states (US Constitution Article IV sec. 3).

Fanatical/Fanatic : an obsessed person with a single minded interest (ref: Oxford ACD, Webster’s).

Federal Criminal Courts – non-Constitutional/Constitutional : Note: There are many federal Courts. However, the Courts referenced within this web site are federal Criminal Courts authorized under the US Constitution and other Criminal Legislative Courts authorized by (A)cts of Congress and/or for the District of Columbia. For the most part (over 99% of the time) these non-Constitutional Courts are knowingly unlawful and inhumane and in direct deliberate violation of the Constitution when applied to either sovereign Citizens; or any of the Sovereign states, of the 50 States of the Union.

Additional note: These Courts are clearly identified within the US Constitution and throughout the laws passed by the US Congress over the past 100 years. Pay very close attention to the way each one of these Federal Criminal courts are spelled using no capital letters, some capital letters and all capital letters. This is no mistake (or typo); as these same exact Courts appear in their exact spellings; with and without capital letters; over the last 100 years consistently; hundreds of thousands of times in laws passed; cases cited; and the headings on federal court records; documents and indictments. These evil deceitful tactics were deliberate and the reasons for this is set forth on this web link and sub links.

A. Constitutional criminal courts formed :

1. the supreme Court of the United States is in fact the highest Court of the United States and was established under the US Constitution (Article III sec. 1).

2. The appellate courts of the United States are in fact Appellate Courts which must adhere to the laws put forth by the Constitution.

3. The district courts of the United States are in fact courts of original jurisdiction for crimes against the United States and must adhere to the laws put forth in the Constitution.

4. The district courts and appellate courts of the United States which are Constitutional Courts under Article III of the Constitution had a name substitution approval between the years of 1934 and 1948. These Constitutional Article III Courts may now be called either; United States district court, or United States court of appeals, or district or appellate courts of the United States (ref: rule 1, 1948 Amendment Federal rules of criminal procedure, advisory committee notes).

Note: on this name change although the first letters in United States are capitalized which is proper; there are no CAPITAL letters whatsoever in either the term district court or court of appeals. This is by design and deliberate to fool the public into believing that the now added name of the Constitutional Article III Court United States district court is the exact same court as the United States District Court or THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT which it is not .

Likewise, the Constitutional appellate courts now named United States court of appeals is not the territorial appellate court called the United States Court of Appeals or the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS.

Important note: There are many courts with different names; 50 is a fair figure; and the vast majority are courts created by the US legislature. The vast majority are unlawful when criminally applied to people within the United States. Before the name change it was very easy to detect the federal courts formed and operating under the Constitution. This because they were always identified as courts of the United States . Such as the district court of the United States and appellate courts of the United States . The name change of these courts functioning under the Constitution was made for the express purpose to convince the people of the United States that were in a federal court operating under the Constitution; when in fact they were not . The appearance of a Constitutional court; but not a Constitutional Court.

5. The United States District Court and Appellate Courts are recognized courts of record within the United States; and are non-constitutional courts when used to enforce laws against the people within the 50 states.

B. Non-constitutional courts:

1. The United States District Court : is a recognized legislative court formed for the District of Columbia by the legislature to have jurisdiction over the territories owned by the United States, or possessed by the United States as well as a court of record. These courts do NOT have jurisdiction over any person committing alleged crimes inside the boundaries of the 50 states of the Union. These District Courts spelled with a capital D and C were created to appear as they operate under the US Constitution when for the most part they DO NOT (ref: Law title 28).

2. The United States Appellate Court : reference above paragraph.

3. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT : reference above 2 paragraphs with one important addition! This Mystery Federal Court does not exist within any laws, nor is it referenced anywhere that 3 attorneys and 4 legal researchers could find in years of research. To legally exist this court must be formed by the legislature, or the Constitution; no one seems to have formed this court. This court is a Kangaroo Court of no authority offering a Jury trial unlawfully; and poorly attempting to give the appearance of a Constitutional court.

4. THE UNITED STATES APPELLATE COURT : reference above paragraph

Important Note: The federal Judges are the same judges which control the Constitutional courts and the non-constitutional Federal Courts, appearing to the public, as operating under the Constitution (ref. US Constitution and all laws).

Federal Trial by Jury/Jury Trial : Trial by jury is guaranteed by the US Constitution. The two terms clearly appear to have different meanings, although deliberately hidden (cloaked) from the public knowledge of US Citizens.

   Federal Trial by Jury guaranteed by the Constitution for all citizens of the 50 states in criminal federal cases: an impartial Jury of a person’s peers who are sovereign citizens of the Republic of the United States. As sovereign citizens, the jury while in the courtroom is the law of the land, and may decide each case as to whether any law is applicable while having the power to void any law on a case by case basis. As a group; each jury is the government; and decides exactly what the law states as pertaining to the accused innocence or guilt. The presiding judge, nor anyone else may instruct the Jury as to what the law says or means. The jury is present at every stage of the Trial and hears all arguments. There are no secret side bars, or preliminary court housekeeping without the Jury being present. The judge is not the law in the courtroom, the Jury is. The judge may not decide any law, nor issue any jury instructions pertaining to the guilt or innocence of the accused. A judge is merely a referee between the accused, the Government, and the Jury. There are no rules of evidence, and the judge has no discretion to not admit any relevant evidence. The prosecution does not always have the right to present his final argument against the defendant just before the jury makes its decision. These are only a few of the differences between a Trial by Jury under the Constitution and non-constitutional Jury trials.

   Federal Jury Trial : A Jury Trial is authorized under the law at title 18 sec. 3691 under contempts constituting crimes and states as follows: “shall conform as near as may be to the practice in other criminal cases.” In other words the appearance of law (Jury) not real law (Jury). It clearly appears that a Federal Jury trial is a Jury brought forth in a Federal courtroom to appear that the defendant is receiving a trial in a Constitutional court. When in fact the defendant is not. In a Jury trial the Federal Judge has total discretion to throw out any evidence; disqualify any witnesses and testimony, hold secret side bar discussions (kept from the ears of the Jurors): operate under local rules under the direction of the District of Columbia; force defense attorneys to swear to operate under the Courts made up rules directed by the District of Columbia, dictate to the Jury what the law says and means; order the Jury what to consider and in essence what to find (guilt or innocence) and allow the Government to sway the Jury by presenting their final argument last every time; before the Jury makes its decision. The person (judge) that controls the jury controls the verdict. Jury Trial is only the appearance of a trial by jury; not trial by jury. These are only a very few of the differences between a Federal non-constitutional Jury trial and a constitutional trial by jury (ref: the laws and titles as stated and the millions of cases tried).

Foreign State : Term is used to refer to another state. An American state different from the one under discussion. The several United States are considered “foreign” to each other (ref: Black’s 6-7).

idem sonans : This term means; in law: names that sound the same when spoken, however are not spelled exactly the same in actuality (ref: Black’s 6-7). Additionally, the spelling of names in all capital letters, partial capital letters and no capital letters have totally different meanings in most all cases in law, on legal documents, names of Courts and upon Court records. As an example: the United States district court is not the same court as the United States District Court, or the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. A name such as James T. Kimball is not the same person necessarily as JAMES T. KIMBALL in legal terms unless James T. Kimball allows and legally accepts the name JAMES T. KIMBALL (ref: Black’s 6-7).

Kangaroo Court : A deceptive court in which the outcome is already known before trial (bias). A person’s rights do not exist (ref: Black’s 6-7).

legal Person/artificial Person : An entity, coated by law and given certain legal rights and duties of a human being, real or imaginary, who for legal purposes is treated as a human being (ref: Black’s 6-7).

liberty : “Freedom from all restraints, except such as justly imposed by law. A franchise or personal power, being some part of the sovereign power, vested in an individual. Guaranteed protection against interference with the interests and rights held clear and important by large classes of civilized men (ref: Black’s 6).

Northwest Ordinance : The Northwest Ordinance was adopted into the US Constitution as the law of the land for all states in the Union. Northwest Ordinance

Peers/Jury of your peers : Peers are other people of equal status and rank as to one another (ref: Black’s); presumably people of equal knowledge and stature in life. Jury of your peers , although not clearly defined in modern references, appears to be; people standing in judgment of others; equal in status and knowledge. A jury of ones’ peers is an absolute right under the law of the Land; The US Constitution via the Northwest Ordinance, as is trial by Jury.

Republic/Democracy : “A system of Government in which the people hold sovereign power and elect representatives who exercise that power. It contrasts on the one hand with pure democracy, in which the people or community as an organized whole wield the sovereign power of government, and on the other with the rule of one person” (ref: Black’s 7).

Sovereign : a person vested with independent and supreme authority; also a body or state (ref: Black’s 7).

Sovereign Power : The power to make and enforce laws (ref: Black’s 7).

Sovereign State : an independent existence not dependent upon any larger whole. A government in itself not subject to any larger whole. A political community whose members are subject to some control authority, whose commands the members must obey, such as each state’s laws, (ref: Black’s 7).

title : a law or laws passed by US Congress, by act, or otherwise (ref: Oxford ACD, Blacks, Webster’s).

Treason : The crime of betraying ones country, attempting to kill the sovereign, or overthrow the Government, the action of betraying someone or something (ref: Oxford ACD, Random House).

United States : is the United States referenced in the Constitution as a Union of the states with the seat of Government presently located in the District of Columbia which is not a Union State. The United States Government consists of elected officials from the currently 50 States which may pass criminal laws for the United States territories and possessions outside the limits of the individual 50 states. However, may not pass or enforce any laws within any of the 50 states or against state citizens; unless such laws are passed as Constitutional amendments and stated within the Constitution. Currently only 3 crimes are mentioned within the Constitution. They are treason, counterfeiting or piracy (ref: the US Constitution Article I section 8, Article III sec 2, sec. 3. The United States as referenced within the Constitution as the union of the several states (50 states) and seat of Government; is not the United States of America which is referenced in a territorial sense; as the several states located on the Continent of North America. Thus the United States of America referenced in the introduction of the Constitution prior to Article I is used in a territorial sense.

United States of America :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : This idem sonans does not appear in any law that could be found to legally exist by 3 attorneys and many legal researchers after years of research. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA appears to be an unlawful, entity of absolutely no authority who has been unlawfully indicting citizens of the 50 states for over 40 years. Apparently for the District of Columbia.

US Citizen : is a natural person born in one of the states of the United States, or domiciled with permission in a particular state city or town (ref. Black’s and Oxford ACD).

US Constitution : The United States Constitution is the Supreme law of the land as is the Northwest Ordinance which was adopted in its entirety within the Constitution to be effective for all of the states of the Union. US Constitution : Also see Northwest Ordinance.

Zealot : a fanatical person, uncompromising in their pursuit of their political or other ideals (ref: Oxford ACD, Random House). Additionally; for this web site the meaning is increased to mean: a person, or group of persons that are extremely wealthy and/or, are in positions of power, whose ambitions are to control large numbers of people, to include Communities, States, and Countries; to the detriment of the people; to increase their power and wealth. These fanatical people have no respect for humanity or human life in their lust for power and money. Pure evil.

back to
No Justice -
No Constitution